Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : PSUN A new breakout at $30+! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Graphs who wrote (1454)	8/17/1999 1:20:00 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1622

OK, we can hang in there on PSUN, no problem. Negatives about retail have seemingly been popular lately, and PSUN may be suffering by being tarred with that brush -- despite results that should make blowing the top off old highs a piece of cake... In a similar vein, the news out of LTXX has been MUCH better than one could ask for, and if the stock were to sell at the same ratios as their companions in the field, the price would be somewhere between 17 and 25, instead of under 12. And the news almost assuredly is going to get better, now worse... so I bought more today -- and it closed down once more -- just no respect!! <GG> CAMP -- love that growth rate!!, and accelerating. Next year could really blow the numbers away. Good call, good stock. I may have to add a few shares. I did get a good price on AMKR, but wasn't expecting the pullback. How about that CTEC?...since almost all my buy was in the range of 2 3/16 to 2 5/8 you might guess that there has been some happiness in the heir ranks as CTEC has doubled (plus) over the past three months. For not being in on the pre-surge activity, you timed your own buy rather well --- all the good news is coming out now, and prospects are looking the best they have since back when the stock was trading over 15. Hope we see that price again within the next year.. It can even move faster than PSUN, and I wouldn't be offended, would you? <gg> Cheers! tso

To: E. Graphs who wrote (1454)	8/17/1999 3:20:00 AM
From: Duane L. Olson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1622

E!: //OT// CAMP beta.iqc.com OK, I have a couple of orders in for CAMP -- I can't stand it! <G> And looks like I might have to enter at the top, but with the momentum on my side, perhaps I won't get burned all that badly <g> Looking at that weekly chart on CAMP (above)....it reminded me that I was once told that you could determine the height of a subsequent advance by the length of the preceding basing move.... Do you suppose there is anything to that? tso