Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MIKE REDDERT who wrote (14606)	8/17/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: red_dog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

What kind of odds are you giving, maybe I can make more with you. <g> RG

To: MIKE REDDERT who wrote (14606)	8/17/1999 12:32:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 29970

Higher sequential costs? What is this babble? You are saying that if price ignored this "news" yesterday and it ignores it today, then the odds favor a price rise. Huh? Then you conclude a bottom is in place. Huh and huh? What you are actually trying to do is put on some kind of smoke and mirror show to prove vicariously through the public that if you are right, then you are ok. If you are wrong, no one will care and so there is no risk in this venture. That means there's no gain either. In fact, there is a loss and that comes from the fact that your methods have no accuracy as you have discovered and have a negative expected return worse than random choice. But since you got nothing else but this collection of tea leaves and word game nonsense, you persist in this charade. You're only fooling yourself.