SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microphonics Inc. (mrps) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: saigon69 who wrote (7597)8/17/1999 3:03:00 AM
From: LT  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 8189
 
Houston (MRPS) we have a problem....

Seems we haven't been told all about competition or patents.

This doesn't look real good......

Haven't heard a thing from MRPS on any new contracts...

I hope we don't see sub $1

Still kicking myself for not selling at 3 5/32

Regards
LT



To: saigon69 who wrote (7597)8/17/1999 9:41:00 AM
From: Mark McNew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8189
 
What say all you friggin' hypester longs about Spy's post? Don't you dare sit there and pretend to ignore it!!!

Interesting device, it has some similarities to the Microphonics units, but it is not quite the same thing.

What's your point? I see nothing wrong with this picture. They have a different test unit that does some functions that on the surface 'sound' the same, but it is not the same.

People that use electronic test equipment would be familier with the difference between, say, a digital multimeter and an analog meter. Each has it's uses in different situations, and the existence of one does not diminish the usefullness of the other.

. Is this other company a fraud?

Hard to say with only a short look at the web site. Probably not though.

Do they only exist to discredit mrps and SSA?

I'm not sure whether that premise or the question is more ridiculous <g>.

Speaking of which, what about that patent information???????

What about it? SSA stated that a statement clarifying the patent information is coming soon.

What patents?

See previous answer...

Is this other company in violation of mrps' patent rights???

Probably not... Fluke can hold patents on all or various parts of it's digital multimeter designs, but that doesn't prevent others from designing similar devices, just not exactly the same.

Is this bashing???

It is if you keep repeating the same patant crap over and over. We went over this the other day and are waiting for information. The information on a potential copmpetitor is not bashing, but the way in which you presented it (friggin' hypester longs) and other phrases makes it appear so, IMHO <g>.

Mark



To: saigon69 who wrote (7597)8/17/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Mitch  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8189
 
Saigon, Re your post about SDT. It is interesting that when you go to the following URL which is Nissans., you will find Ultraphonics listed as a supplier, but not SDT. Could Nissan also be party yo the MRPS P&D attempt? Your ignorance is matched only by your arrogance and your low esteem for the intelligence of the longs on this thread and their ability to DD.
nissantechmate.com




To: saigon69 who wrote (7597)8/17/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: Brian D. Potts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8189
 
Saigon,

If they were the same product, why would these big companies buy both and not just stick with the one vendor.

They must see that the MRPS product has separate and distinct uses.

bdpotts