Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (23659)	8/17/1999 5:34:00 AM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Reply number 1 to Riley G. __________________________ From: "Cathy Credulous" <cathycredulous@my-deja.com> Subject: Re: Riley G vs. the Wily B web site! Date: 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 GMT Organization: I'll Believe Anything Now Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.magic,alt.news-media,alt.paranet.paranormal,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic Riley G wrote in message <7lrss8$j2v$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>... > >Reference to magneticdiary.com ... >I am interested in seeking civil torts for any and all available actions >against those responsible for their ongoing activities and the server DNAI >for the sum of $10 million plus dollars for the damages done by their >malicious attacks upon me. LOL! Guess you need the $10 million to pay for the damage you did to the Mars rover? Idiot. -- Cathy _____________ number 2 ____________ From: gblack@pop.ihug.co.nz (George Black) Subject: Re: Riley G vs. the Wily B web site! Date: 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 GMT Organization: The Internet Group (Hamilton) Newsgroups: alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic In article <378794cf.31134155@news.mindspring.com>, ItIs@mysig.emailthere wrote: >"Riley G" <Riley.G@PSI...COP.com> wrote: > > >>Reference to magneticdiary.com > >>Please note that in other places in the website, that I am mentioned by >>name, altered likeness to appear as the serial killer / serial bomber called >>the Unabomber. >>example: magneticdiary.com > > >Thanks for the heads up - a great web site. Are you saying that you >bear a likeness to the Unibomber? That is a great picture. > >If you hadn't posted it I would have never know what a wonderful site >parodies you out there. > > >Get over it. Bitching about it on newsgroups doesn't do anything but >draw negative attention. You are foolish to think otherwise, but what >else is new? > Well I went and looked :-))) Quite amusing. Tomorrow is only a day away. George ________ number 3 __________ From: Chris Sutor <cobalt@tiger.tigerden.com> Subject: Re: Riley G vs. the Wily B web site! Date: 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 GMT Organization: Tigerden Internet Services Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.magic,alt.news-media,alt.paranet.paranormal,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic Riley G <Riley.G@PSI...COP.com> spake thusly: : Here is the link to the person who owns the web domain and site that I am : thinking about suing in civil court for their repeated libel, and repeated : defamations of character, and the use of my likeness to depict the : Unabomber. Parody of publc figures is constitutionally protected speech. Or are you not the hotshot celebrity you pretend to be? -- COBALTatTIGERDENdotCOM I'd really like a New World Order, but ----==============---- I can only afford a slightly used one. now with 10% real ***************************************** fruit juice! Don't blame me, I voted for Richard Dangerous ____________ number 4 ___________ From: bhutch@SPblockAMcris.com (Bruce Hutchinson) Subject: Re: Riley G vs. the Wily B web site! Date: 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 GMT Organization: Concentric Internet Services Newsgroups: sci.skeptic gblack@pop.ihug.co.nz (George Black) scribed: >In article <3782DEF7.C3154227@cyberhouse.com>, Dennis Keim ><dennis@cyberhouse.com> wrote: >> >> >>Riley G wrote: >>> Richard Winelander, >>> (Attorney for Riley G) > >Wasn't Winelander the one that Earl kept refering to? Yup! The one and the same. But it gets better'n that. Winelander is the Attorney that represented Geller in one or more of those useless lawsuits against Randi and CSICOP. He lost them all. Winelander was also the attorney that represented Eldon Byrd in a case against Randi. The charge was slander and revolved around a slip of the tongue Randi made. When Byrd tried to heckle Randi, The Amazing One mentioned to the crowd that Byrd was "a convicted child molestor". When the case came up, Randi cheerfully admitted that he had indeed slandered Byrd, because while Byrd had _Admitted_ to being a Child Molestor, he had not been _convicted_! An obvious mistake, but never-the-less, it was technically slander. The jury found Randi guilty (they had no choice- Randi admitted saying it.). But, due to the heroic efforts of Winelander, who tried everything possible to cast Randi as Evil Incarnate, the Jury was wise enough to award to Byrd damages of the sum of $0.00! That was not a typo. Damages of $0.00! Nada! Zippity-zero dollars. Yep! RileyG has found himself a sympatico loser for his attorney. I hope for riley's sake, that Winelander will work on spec. As he always loses, he will be cheap! hutch ______________ "A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul." --George Bernard Shaw _______ number 5 _________ From: "Ragnar (no, not THE Ragnar)" <rworks@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Riley G vs. the Wily B web site! Date: 07 Jul 1999 00:00:00 GMT Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. Newsgroups: alt.fan.art-bell,alt.paranormal,sci.skeptic So he's a loser from way back? Cathy Credulous wrote: > Avital Pilpel wrote in message <7m06qi$dj1$1@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>... > >Dennis Keim <dennis@cyberhouse.com> wrote in message > > > >>If you attorney hasn't been able to get something done to your > >>satisfaction in a year, either he thinks it is not worthy of pursuit or > >>he is incapable and you should seek new counsel. > > > >Presuming, that is, that this "attorney" actually exists. > > Last time I checked Richard Winelander does exist and practices > law in Baltimore, MD. > I think he was involved in the Geller/Randi/CSICOP lawsuits.> > Cathy ______________ z...............