SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Boplicity who wrote (139403)8/17/1999 9:42:00 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Greg- I believe the market's reaction to Dell's earnings announcement will be pretty straightforward (to figure out):

(1) Best possible scenario: .18 and expanding GM

* Stock should pop a couple points and settle in a range around 45 (+/- 3/4 pts)...until we get near next earnings

(2) Good/not bad scenario(s):

A. .17 BUT expanding GM
B. .18 BUT lessening GM

(Perhaps) surprisingly, the stock may react better to A (even with less EPS) than B...although we will probably
see a similar reaction to both.....Dell stuck in low 40's....with possible (likely) dips into high 30's....(even touching 35 if a massive market selloff, unlikely, would take place...then Dell/techs would be screaming buys, and would recover quickly)...and we should see surges into mid 40's during the quarter..no higher than 47/48......until next earnings...

3. .17 AND LESSENING GM

The stock will take an after-earnings hit of 2/3 pts. and settle around 39/40....This would not be good for the stock (this quarter)...it will be hard to jump start it....

** I am assuming that the forward will be bullish as usual, with small (if any) impact from Y2K noted...Of course, any change here could have an impact. Also, a joker will be if NEXT YEAR EARNINGS(which should be very strong) gets on the radar screen of the analyst's (questions)..That could help the stock near-term too....

This is my best guess, and I am sticking to it <G> Of course, I have never been wrong in the past <VBG>