To: VinWood who wrote (662 ) 8/18/1999 8:56:00 AM From: guerillero.de Respond to of 1794
"Can you elaborate on Linux applications and how they fare vs. windows? They don't. No one in their right mind is going to dump Windows and replace it with Redhat, except
for hardcore Microsoft haters. To switch to Linux is just buying yourself a bunch of grief." Not exactly true, IMHO. There's a bunch of office suites (word processing, spreadsheet, presentation tool etc)
out there which have about the same quality and functionality as MS applications (e.g. by StarOffice,
Applixware), according to some extensive test in a german computer mag (c't: wwww.heise.de - sorry, all german). The main problem by switching to these applications is the fact that MS apps are a de facto standard: when you
have to exchange documents, you basically have to do it in MS office format (well, and you still have the choice
of all the incompatibel versions of office95, office97 etc.). For this aspect, I agree that you could get some
trouble when switching to LINUX apps. When you are working stand-alone or most of the people you are
communicating with agree for some standard data exchange format, then this is not a problem. Looking at some more advanced applications (databases etc.), there is a lot out there (even public domain
software) which can be compared with MS applications. From my experience (I was working for a big 6 firm for 5
years in the systems integration area), the quality of MS products is (to state it modest) not so great - people
are just used to this quality level and accept it as normal. I could have avoided some of the grief I got from using MS
applications, when I would have been free to switch to other platforms. This has nothing to do with being a
"MS-hater", this is just an observation. To come to an end, in my opinion, most Linux applications do not have to hide from MS applications, in some cases
there are even superior. On the desktop, it is just a matter of "what's the standard". All the best g.