Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill c. who wrote (9206)	8/17/1999 5:13:00 PM
From: Techplayer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

bill c., I do agree with your statement. There has to be a pain threshold and right now Ebbers is throwing LU under the bus AND saying that there is no commitment in going forward. LU appears to be in a lose-lose situation, so they need to make the facts known. If Ebbers softens the stance, I'll bet that the reasons for the failure stay a bit more muted. Brian

To: bill c. who wrote (9206)	8/17/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: HeyRainier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21876

For any of the financial analysts in this thread, are any of you concerned about the increases in 'Accounts Receivable' and 'Inventory' relative to the company's sales growth? I have these figures, from 6/98 to 6/99: Accts Receivable: +63.8% Inventory: +74.2% Sales: +19.7% (TTM) Inventory as a percentage of sales has increased to 18.7% vs. 12.8%, so it would seem that these figures would have a relatively larger impact on earnings as we move forward. Completed goods inventories grew 83.0% while work-in-progress and raw materials were up 64.0%. This is not the kind of trend one wants to see in a fine company such as Lucent. Usually inventories build up more quickly relative to sales when there is a relative stagnation in sales growth. Accounts receivables move up in the current fashion when the company opts for more lenient credit policies in order to get sales out the door more quickly, but to the detriment of either (1) more stale receivables in the future or (2) a sort of "borrowing from the future" to get sales up higher in the current period. Unless there's some compensatory surge in demand in the future, the short term gains may come at the expense of future earnings. I would like to hear some others' thoughts on the matter. --Rainier