SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ToySoldier who wrote (28319)8/17/1999 10:16:00 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Toy, That study by IDC is very positive on MSFT. The only negative according to them was that adoption of Windows2k would take place over a longer period of time.

Respondents in the study also said they have no plans to immediately roll out the Windows 2000 operating system. Organizations of all types and sizes indicated they plan to wait anywhere from 6 to 18 months before beginning wide-scale implementation of the new Microsoft enterprise operating system. The number-one reason given by respondents for the delay in adopting Windows 2000 was technical stabilization of the operating system. A full 50% of respondents said the technical stabilization of Windows 2000 would cause them to delay implementation.

"Past issues with first-release operating systems from Microsoft have caused organizations to reign in their Windows 2000 deployment plans," said William Peterson, research manager for IDC's Client Infrastructure Software programs. "This is not to say Windows 2000 will not be a success; just the opposite, IDC believes Windows 2000 will succeed - over time."


A few things to remember:
-I believe an analyst from this organization was on TV last year saying how Windows98 was not going to be the success it turned out to be. Must have used the same kind of surveys to arrive at those conclusions.
-Once deployment by organizations begins, something will happen. It is known as fear. There would be the fear that a company's competitors are commencing early adoption. Now that would create a bit of a panic and the deployment plans will be moving up. Then we are off to the races!!!
-What IT managers say in surveys may not be indicative of their real plans. As it is well known that there is a "slight" tendency among IT people to dislike or hate MSFT. These people are not going to respond to the survey truthfully especially if they are likely to be pro-MSFT result. Ultimately, they will go with MSFT once they have consulted with the other big wigs in the company. Considering these companies are in tough competitive environments (in their line of business), the tendency will be there to go with the brand name supported by the world's richest company. No matter what the survey says.

Now here we go.

RAH RAH RAH---Go Microsoft !!!! <ggg>



To: ToySoldier who wrote (28319)8/18/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: DownSouth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Toy, I have a problem with this "report". I find it incredible that Novell could lead the market in which INKT, CSCO, NTAP, CacheFlow and several others have been fighting for market share far longer than NOVL.

Does the original report give comparisons? Is this research group associated with NOVL?



To: ToySoldier who wrote (28319)8/18/1999 12:49:00 PM
From: Stormweaver  Respond to of 74651
 
B.S. - Novell invests more in spin and marketing than R&D. Current stock price is directly proportional to spin investment; as a result I see NOVL going back to $9 bucks where it belongs!

hehehehehe