SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John E.Quinn who wrote (3188)8/18/1999 8:12:00 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3744
 
Zackly how many miles do you think you have to drive from Thunder Bay to the Stillwater mine? Minnesota is not far from TBay. And the Mafics of the Stillwater complex exist on just inside the CDN side notably in Pardee and continue both ways between the two locations.

Also analogously the Kimberlites of Michigan, showing on the surface continue through to Sault Ste Marie, Canada and up through Agawa and into Wawa in a broad belt. It is the same sort of scale.

You can be down in a mine in Val D'or and looking at a vein. I can then blind fold you, turn you around (I am sure that would not be too hard) and take you by airplane to Snow Lake Manitoba, take you down in a gold mine and make you look up at the gold vein again. You would not know you had left. Same rocks, andesite, phonolite, trachyte, pillow lava, tuff S and P diorite, same vein structure and size, same accessory mineralization, same occurrence of gold in vein edge pyrite, same alteration biotite mica etc, same grade, same age. Maybe even same Island Arc chain and water depth. Now that is significant separation geograpchically for humans but it may not be that big a deal in geology.

Gold veins are not all that alike from mine to mine. But these similarities do exist. (And same mineral province.)

Your Stillwater-TBay Lac Des Isles separation (about 90 miles) and the River Valley Sudbury, Wanapatei, Temagami, East Bull Lake separation are not significant distances geologically necessarily. What is more significant are time, grade, metamorphism, setting and mineral content of the intrusive.

EC<:-}



To: John E.Quinn who wrote (3188)8/19/1999 1:17:00 AM
From: Berry Picker  Respond to of 3744
 
RE>>planet Earth is merely a geologic anomaly in our solar system.<<

Actually John Earth is a geological anomaly.. But hey we all like it :-}