SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (58832)8/18/1999 9:48:00 PM
From: pezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<Sure pezz. You assaulted brees' religion and Islamic cultures because of a
perception that those cultures and the religion present something you find repugnan>> Well I agree with this statement.I think that this is a valid reason to assault a religion, don't you? If my perception was faulty it was up to Brees to demonstrate that to me. IMO he did not. I, like you, must be true to my perceptions....Surely you must know that I am not alone in the perception that Islam mistreats women.BTW what do you think?
You know that I was actually accused of "thinking" of calling him a "towel head"? This is how low they think of this term. Yet you actually say it and they are silent.My point is what phonies they are.
<<So there is a great difference between you and I.>> Again we agree[grin]
<<as for folk being afraid of me, I hardly think so. >> Ahhh.... you underestimate your self.
<<You really have little basis to prowl around here like some dang rat, trying to needle folk>> Oh come on. I no more do this than you do.... Needling is what this thread is all about and all of those that I needle do their share of needling so no need to feel sorry for them.
<< The
implications of brees' argument I found repugnant, and I told him so. Simple as that.>> Not quite so simple..... <<I argue my positions strictly as I see them.>> Well although I don't usually agree with your opinions I will say that the above is true.But of course it's true for most of us. As it happens it was not you or your argument that I was addressing . Nor was I concerned by your lack of political correctness. Just the curious lack of condemnation by your comrades.
pez



To: Johannes Pilch who wrote (58832)8/19/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 67261
 
<<I apparently see implications unseen here by others. It happens, which is additional support for my point-of-view.>> hmmm...implications, as in; wonderful opportunities to express your ignorant, narrow minded, hard headed and egotistical bigotry through falsehood. You're wrong though, you are quite visible, liar.