Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (58839)	8/18/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Michelle, Mr. Bush changed his response after The News asked him whether his refusal was inconsistent with the requirement that federal employees answer questions about drug use to get high-level security clearances. This does not mean he caved in to the liberal biased press on the issue, they just asked a legitimate question. btw, I am still wondering why I was the only one to question someone's all wemyn are sluts remark. Even after I did, you asked me what I was talking about. I then yanked my post, for surely if you weren't going to complain about it, why should I? Except that I disagree 100%. don't you?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (58839)	8/18/1999 11:53:00 PM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 67261

Remember where the bar is now set. The current President has been witnessed so high he collapsed in a heap in a garbage can.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (58839)	8/19/1999 12:09:00 AM
From: truedog	Respond to of 67261

to: Michelle Harris from: truedog If,and that's a mighty big if, Bush did possess drugs back in the '80s,the statute of limitations has long since run out so,there is no reason for him to dodge arrest. He just will not allow snot nosed people,like you,to badger him like he was some sort of lackey...TD