Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (18167)	8/19/1999 2:49:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25548

I have already responded to your questions in previous posts. Any proof of involvement of Dayton/Nesbitt burns in a short position will undoubtedly be revealed at trial where Medinah will seek appriopriate compensatory damages. My sources of information have no relevance to the questions I asked you nor any relevance at all, IMO. Certainly, the information is unofficial as nothing in a company PR or on the website states them. Again-the questions: WLD, please explain how you know the BC SEC is investigating 2 "insiders" close to Medinah. Also, the term "insiders" has a special meaning. Do you really mean "insiders" or those "close" to Medinah? Also, since BC SEC has no authority over an American company-they must be investigating something from an involvent previously in an Canadian company-ie has nothing to do with Medinah-care to elaborate?