Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (58898)	8/19/1999 3:06:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

>>if I would be willing to agree that forcing women to bring all pregnancies to term is a good thing, can I assume you also agree that temporary sterilization or some other medical sexual suppression of the male involved is a good idea?<< I am for the participants assuming total responsibility for the outcome of their actions, whatever it may be. Someone related to me a few months ago about a person he knew from high school who has impregnated 4 or 5 women and currently has 10 illegitimate children and pays no child support. I would be completely in favor of "forced" sterilization of this individual. Of course if we didn't have the welfare state still in place, maybe this individual would show a bit of self-imposed sterilization if he knew he would ultimately be required to re-imburse the state for his irresponsible sexual behaviour. bp