Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (18209)	8/19/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25548

WLD may be able to conveniently dodge questions and sidestep the issues on this thread, but when he comes up in front of a judge in a court of law he will have no place to run or hide. WLD: You might as well answer the questions here and now. Your DAY in court might be fast approaching <hee hee> Jane:-)

To: Mike Gold who wrote (18209)	8/19/1999 6:05:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25548

Still waiting for an answer WLD to my questions. And I'm still waiting for mine from you. Did someone at Medinah tell you they had proof of Dayton's shorting activities or did you just make that up? Here's your original post... THE SHORT POSITION IS MASSIVE AND REAL. MEDINAH HAS PROOF. (TIDBIT-THEY HAVE PROOF THAT DAYTON MINING IS BEHIND A LARGE FRACTION OF THE SHORTING THROUGH NESBIT BURNS) Any issue with Dayton falls under Medinah Gold. First you say Medinah knows MDHM is being shorted by Dayton Mining, and now you say that's a Medinah Gold issue and doesn't belong here??? Yeah, that makes sense.