Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : SABRATEK CORP (SBTK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: men mailman who wrote (411)	8/20/1999 1:00:00 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 487

You, amigo, are a very confused person. For starters, it is SBTK being sued, not SBTK doing the suing. There was some brief contoversy manufactured on this board over how Pluvia got access to court filings that SBTK themselves had not yet officially commented on, but nothing ever came of it. people like pluvia should rot in hell Wow, and that's after getting the call right. I can only imagine what you would say if he'd been wrong. It's hard to build a conmpany, it's easy to destroy. If it were that easy, why is Redmond, WA not a smoking crater right now? If critical words can destroy a company then Microsoft cannot possibly still exist. Shaking people out of a good stock is a crime. If a stock that goes from $27 to $5 is a "good" stock, I'd hate to see your idea of a bad one. Also BK companies don't sue. No, but it's amazing how often companies that sue subsequently go BK. You can quote all the numbers all you wish, but your only source for them is a management whose trustworthiness is being seriously called into question. Shareholders hate it when they don't know whether to trust management. See also CD, MCK. THERE WILL ALSO BE A CC CALL We'll be sure to alert Mr. Shor-Ting. What a bargain at these levels. Were you the guy saying the same thing about IRID last week?

To: men mailman who wrote (411)	8/20/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: Peter V	Respond to of 487

<<BTW people like pluvia should rot in hell, and the company should be congradulated for not taking this sitting down, and chose to PROSECUTE him.>> they didn't try very hard, failing to even serve him with papers. they just wanted to shut him up. <<It's hard to build a conmpany, it's easy to destroy. Shaking people out of a good stock is a crime.>> Kevin said it best, but if you think Pluvia is the sole reason the stock went down, you have a greatly exaggerated notion of the power of these threads. Pluvia pointed it out, but it was the street that took notice, not of Pluvia, but of SBTK's delay in its financials, which is always a warning sign. These threads don't move the street, except in very low volume stocks.