Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Information Management Associates - (IMAA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TFF who wrote (28)	8/20/1999 2:01:00 AM
From: Wolff	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 165

Berstein's future credibility is at stake, if she puts a value anywhere near what the daytrader phenomena has done to the current price levels, bearing mind she gave it a hold and top at 4 ....Berstein's career will be toasted. Either for 1. Being so clueless not to be able to understand the stock she is responsible for following, ie if the stock is fairly valued she is so far off he boat now that she is obviously no competent. (remember she is $4 for the year and a hold) or 2. Bending to the current market conditions to swing her recommendations with the tide, thus in effect saying that no stock analysis is worthwhile since the market will place a value on it. Will she change he price targets after Greenspan speaks? What she needs to do is to consider the merits of the company and the stock. People have said this is a MO-MO stock and fundamentals don't matter, well I suggest anyone who believes that should not be in the business of a stock analysis role such as Bernstein. I posted a larger article on the fundamentals of IMAA, I suspect that they will go un responded too by this long crowd. Why, because the longs here are not for the long haul. They don't need to be either. No investor needs to look at the long term if they don't want to. But paid analysts do! Bernstein Does. regards wolff