SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jttmab who wrote (3539)8/19/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 769670
 
One last self-editorial comment....at $3,000 per head for roads, bridges, national defense, space program, foreign aid, education etc. ......in those terms, that doesn't seem to be an excessive amount on a per head basis. No doubt others would disagree.

Best Regards,
Jim



To: jttmab who wrote (3539)8/20/1999 12:43:00 AM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 769670
 
Oh geez... you are faster and than me and you've already burst my bubble. I agree with your points already - AGI is the key issue... BUT, (and I'm just getting through this), I thought Forbes' plan said flat tax (17% or whatever) with no deductions... medical, state tax, charity, those misc. deductions etc. That is a huge improvement right there I thought... not that I want to remove these deductions with the current rates but if you drop the rates then thats just fine - get rid of every deduction in the book I say.

I noticed capital gains are not taxable and I have a HUGE problem with that, since I think all cap gains should be taxed just like income.

I'm satisfied with medical savings accounts he proposes... I assumed current benefits would come out of the general fund which seems like exactly what we do now doesn't it? All this "set ss funds aside" rhetoric is just that - I just want the whole thing overhauled but only going forward, of course.

On your point about 3K taxes per person, I agree with you in general terms that is just fine, 3K is not too much. The problem I have with taxes is mostly the federal/Fica/property tax hit that middle income people have to pay, some of which is redistribution of wealth (Fica), which is a disproportional hit to that group's income vs. the wealthy with cap gains who pay much less. I think there are reverse robin hood inequities in the tax code all over the place, and the only way I see to fix that is with a flat tax where everybody is even.