Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stewart kagel who wrote (29638)	8/20/1999 12:17:00 AM
From: Tecinvestor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

I've come to believe that the need for an alliance between AOL and AT&T is a non-issue. AT&T has created a fiction by superficially attempting to protect against open access (i.e. high speed internet access via cable modem). In so doing, AT&T has tried to instill in our minds that cable modem is not only indispensable, but is the best and only way to go. Not so, I say. AOL has a good bargaining chip when it comes to the table with AOL. Having lined up the baby bells for high speed internet access via DSL, AOL is, I believe, in a superior bargaining position. It may very well be that AOL, and not AT&T, is dictating the terms in this negotiation. It may well be that AT&T needs AOL more than AOL needs AT&T. Of course, the rural areas are probably better and more efficiently serviced by cable modem as opposed to DSL, so it would appear to me that AT&T has more leverage in the rural areas; unless, of course, AOL affiliates in the rural areas with a satellite provider (such as SOFN), or microwave provider (such as TGNT or WCII) for high speed internet access. What a dance. Round and round we go. I believe AT&T and AOL will work out an alliance, on terms that are favorable to AOL. JMHO.