SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Hurst who wrote (3599)8/20/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Makes no difference that she runs for anything now. Point being the press did not press her on it. If it is important(so important that all the press is drooling all over the bus even though GWB has said it was more than a LONG TIME AGO, GET OVER IT) enough for pres. then it is also important to have pressed her in the Tx gov. campaign, esp. in a border state as big as Texas.

Boy are you dumb.

Yet another classic observation. Glass houses Hurst, glass houses.

dan



To: Don Hurst who wrote (3599)8/20/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Respond to of 769670
 
What did GWB answer when he was asked the drug question during the Texas governor's race?. Now that Richards has entered the race for President, I agree with you; she needs to answer the cocaine question.


Well, I'm sure Richards was an alcoholic, that is certainly believable, I kind of doubt any drug activity just because she's the wrong generation for that.... however I do know one of her big problems was that reporters would go off on these personal tangents just like you see people doing here... the big hair and stuff like that, therefore she was always trying to cut it off. Richards had such a big mouth its hard to believe she was a liar, jmo. I'm not some huge Richards fan but a lot of people are.



To: Don Hurst who wrote (3599)8/20/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: truedog  Respond to of 769670
 
to: Don Hurst
from: truedog

Don, if you think so highly of the office of POTUS,why did you liberals elect such a reprobate as Clinton to the office. His faults were common knowledge before the election even though he denied them and was caught up with later? You use a singular standard. Whatever you believe is good. Whatever you disagree with is bad.The transparent nature of the self centered liberal is quite evident...TD