Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ATI Technologies in 1997 (T.ATY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marc who wrote (3900)	8/20/1999 12:15:00 PM
From: Marc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5927

Once again, very good job by the Canadian press, and Mark Evens from the Globe and Mail. globeinvestor.com ==================== my opinion now: Everything looks good, but then they add to ask Peter Glaskowsky opinion, one of the few who was seeing Intel chew ATI since the beginning, now that Intel is out, he needs to find BS again, where are his market share numbers. Did he really expect Peter Glaskowsky to say that was positive for ATI or did he knew his answer and thit is the reason he (Evens) asked the question. But the real question is why do they do that. MArc

To: Marc who wrote (3900)	8/20/1999 3:43:00 PM
From: Sleeperz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5927

Intel is not working on a standalone graphics chipset but now only graphics for incorporation into integrated chipsets. First the i810 then the i820. PS: If Intel is no longer working on graphics, how will they intergrated graphic and core logic if they don't have a graphic product. PS. Intel only got into the graphics business, like they do with every other venture is to promote the rapid growth of their uPs through the lowering of the cost of key technology like chipsets, modems and now graphics and networking/internet and soon DVD. Intel leads and others follow.