Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (69338)	8/20/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572946

Tench, Re: "MB's and Athlons" At the end of the day AMD is responsible for this MB fiasco even if Intel is playing dirty. Also perhaps u can comment on the simulated SPEC numbers for merced that show it is slower than a 650 Mhz Athlon. This has got to be another disaster coming up for Intel after all the hype for the last 5 years. regards, Kash

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (69338)	8/20/1999 1:44:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572946

Tenchusatsu RE <<<I think Tom is full of it once again. In those e-mail updates, there have been NO MENTION of Intel anywhere, yet Tom is again drawing false assumptions.>>> The truth is these are not conspiracy theories; its fairly normal business practice in this country as far as I can tell. Its not done overtly but its done none the less. You HAVE seen the infamous B. Gates memos to intc? My question to you is why do you think it is not possible? From what I can tell, I do not think its simply because you work for intc. But maybe I am wrong. ted