Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ProNetLink...PNLK...Click here to enter -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (23290)	8/20/1999 1:42:00 PM
From: May Tran	Respond to of 40688

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (23290)	8/20/1999 2:22:00 PM
From: Benjamin A. Meyer	Respond to of 40688

Howard, that was truly one of the most thoughtful, insightful, and profound (well, maybe more thoughtful and insightful than profound) posts that I have read in a while. It takes something of that nature to stir a lurker like me to post. I am happy to learn that you called Glenn (and by the quality of your post, I'm sure you are well spoken and considerate), and I agree with your's and Glenn's assessment that critical mass has or soon will be achieved. I believe that they have a very successful model and Wall Street will soon wake to find itself with yet another heavyweight Internet contender. Glenn, thank you as well for coming to this nursery school and calming the children with reasonable answers to the scary stories and frightening questions. You bring with you sensibility, maturity, and most importantly, enlightenment. I, too, listened to Tim about the supposed "insiders" trader. Yet, I was aware that insiders had locked their shares. Glenn clarified this for us all and for that I am grateful. Anyway, as with all stocks, PNLK is a risk. However, I believe it to be a calculated risk in which the reward outweighs the risk. Everything (well, mostly)ProNetLink has done has confirmed the wisdom of my gamble and I have yet to pull down a bet. I wish all good luck and again, my thanks to Howard, Glenn, and yes, even Tim (he raised pertinent questions albeit in a provoking manner) (and he did get Glenn here) for the reading material found here today. Respectfully, Ben

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (23290)	8/20/1999 2:26:00 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 40688

hi howard, long time no talk, i hope all is well with you and your family. regards t

To: out_of_the_loop who wrote (23290)	8/20/1999 4:58:00 PM
From: terri acey	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 40688

Thank you Dr Howard ..I have always enjoyed your posts... I am glad Glenn put at ease some of your questions..although I have not called him on the phone he has always been expeditious in his email responses to me... This was an unusual day...Glenn rarely takes time from his very busy schedule to monitor and answer questions on SI..his time is very valuable as is all ours as well, I had other plans myself but stayed thru his lunch hour to see what he had to say.... For some reason, Tim has always liked PNLK and when he starts posting on the thread it brings all kind of emotions from the long term PNLKers..He certainly knows how to do his own DD but does get a kick or a thrill showing his presence...I have respected Tim from way back and I was actually sorry when he went off SI for awhile....I just hope the next go around isn't so disruptive... My feelings aside, I am not adverse to letting Tim know when I feel he is out of line and last night was one of them... Pity we can't be all one big happy family ......LOL!!!!!