SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (3722)8/20/1999 1:45:00 PM
From: melinda abplanalp  Respond to of 769669
 
NOT!!



To: Machaon who wrote (3722)8/20/1999 1:57:00 PM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
Your posts are living proof that it would not matter who was the subject GWB or Forbes or whomever..... thanks

And, being against fetal cell research is a real "head in the sand" act of stupidity. Fetal research and medical use of fetal tissue could cure a lot of diseases and pain

Of course discounting the pain an abortionist provides an unborn child. But HEY...long as it is not YOUR pain, huh?

Who is the nice guy?



To: Machaon who wrote (3722)8/20/1999 2:07:00 PM
From: C Kahn  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769669
 
Robert Barry, any woman who would have an abortion based on the child's gender should not be having children at all.



To: Machaon who wrote (3722)8/20/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: Les H  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769669
 
In order to effect those laws, he would have to gain public support for each of them. Most people are against partial-birth abortions and late-term abortions of viable births. As for federal funding of abortions, they could always give up the child for adoption. This was a common practice many years ago for many young women who couldn't afford it.