Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lazarre who wrote (59004)	8/20/1999 8:31:00 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<She initiated a financial penalty on Service Corporation on a finding that they violated state regulations. >> Might or might not have held up. <<They went to Bush's chief of staff. >> Don't see GW actually being in the mix. And how did you get from she to they? Evidence GW personally had anything to do with this? Any court decisions that the Service Corporation did wrong?

To: lazarre who wrote (59004)	8/20/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 67261

<<She initiated a financial penalty on Service Corporation on a finding that they violated state regulations. >> She initiated a penalty, did the court enforce it? Who was found guilty? <<She pursued the fine doggedly. Shortly thereafter she was fired.>> Well God damn. Someone pursuing their own agenda that they can't prove gets canned. That's another first in the History of the World.

To: lazarre who wrote (59004)	8/21/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: truedog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

to: Lazarre from: truedog Laz,assuming your hypothesis has any merit, how do you rate the travel office employees and many other firings and requests for resignations of WH personnel who disagreed with the Clintons? That's politics and has gone on for decades. It would be nice if it could be stopped but, how do you propose it be done? Blame this sort of practice all on Bush and let your liberal buddies off the hook? That would be the usual liberal solution...TD