Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (69387)	8/20/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583364

RE <<<And now that Intel is "getting up" again, AMD is going to realize that they lost a unique opportunity.>>> So you think the rumors re Q4 and intc are not true? ted

To: Paul Engel who wrote (69387)	8/21/1999 1:43:00 AM
From: John O'Neill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583364

<<Chuckles - Re: "AMD could have done better to exploit Intel's slippage - a feeling shared by a lot of the people on this thread." And now that Intel is "getting up" again, AMD is going to realize that they lost a unique opportunity.>> I wonder if the powers that be in computers..like IBM,CPQ,HWP..DELL..etc..etc..would really let INTC take over as a monopoly for processors...so intc could squeeze them w/o competition....no way...if need be IBM would probably fund AMD