SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Globalstar Telecommunications Limited GSAT -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (6716)8/21/1999 12:20:00 AM
From: Christopher Williams  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29987
 
Robert X Cringely's take on satellite telephony

pbs.org



To: djane who wrote (6716)8/21/1999 3:37:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29987
 
WashPost. Iridium Falls Back to Earth

By Mark Leibovich
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 22, 1999; Page A1

To Al Gore, this was a milestone in the nation's continuum of innovation.
In a Rose Garden ceremony last October, the administration's
techie-in-chief placed the first call on a mobile phone system called
Iridium, a celebrated project that let users communicate from anywhere on
the globe through a network of 66 satellites orbiting 421 miles above the
earth.

"These . . . systems complete the telephone coverage of the earth's surface
that Alexander Graham Bell began more than a century ago," the vice
president told Gilbert M. Grosvenor, Bell's great-grandson and the
recipient of the ceremonial call. "Your great-grandfather would be very
proud."

But 10 months later, with plans afoot to display the prototype of an
Iridium satellite in the Smithsonian, the District-based company finds itself
galaxies removed from its giddy launch day. Iridium has spiraled
earthward with startling speed, a dazzling triumph of innovation flipped
into a heap of corporate space junk.

Last week, Iridium LLC filed for bankruptcy protection after it missed a
series of payment deadlines on $1.5 billion in bank loans and another $1.5
billion in bonds. It is celebrated now as one of the highest-profile failures
in a realm of technology marked by success stories, a case study of the
disjunction between cold-eyed market forces and heady technology.

Iridium is just one glaring example of the pioneer confounded by the
riddles of supply and demand. "There is a constant pitter-patter of little
companies that focus too much on technology and not on marketing," said
Carl Pitasi, a former director of marketing at Motorola Inc., the
telecommunications powerhouse that initiated the Iridium project more
than a decade ago and that still owns 18 percent of the company.

Pitasi, who now runs an information technology consultancy in Reston,
said that brilliant technical achievements can breed a dangerous hubris.
Innovators can believe that expertise in one area translates seamlessly to
skill in another, he said. And this can prove fatal to a business such as
Iridium-especially in a high-tech world where market forces zig-zag
unforgivingly.

"When you're undertaking a complex high-tech project that will take five
or six years, you can pretty much predict failure," said Michael Cusumano,
a professor at MIT's Sloan School of Management and author of
"Competing on Internet Time." "No one can think that far ahead. All kinds
of better, cheaper innovations can appear."

This is the reality that set Iridium's downward spiral in motion. In 1987,
when Iridium's vision of worldwide mobile phone service was first
conceived, few could foresee today's widespread use of cellular phones.

Bary Bertiger, a Motorola engineer, imagined a boon for globe-trotting
business travelers by letting them converse through a network of 77
low-earth-orbiting satellites (the number was later scaled back to 66). The
notion seduced an elite team of collaborators and investors.

"They thought they had something stupendous," said Alan Marcus,
director of the Center for the Historical Studies of Technology and
Science at Iowa State University. "They thought they could be like a
mobile AT&T for the entire world." In 1991, Motorola formally
incorporated Iridium, named after the element whose atomic number is
77.

By the early '90s, however, the wireless telephone industry was taking
dramatic, unforeseen turns. Cellular service, far less expensive because it
deployed earthbound transmitters and antennas, was taking hold among
Iridium's target customers-business travelers.

Unlike Iridium phones, cellulars could work from inside buildings. Unlike
Iridiums, cellulars did not require open sky overhead. Cell phones were
also much cheaper: Shortly after the Iridium service was introduced last
year, the handsets cost $3,000 apiece, and international calls cost up to
$7 a minute.

This was prohibitive to most customers, and left Iridium to scramble
somewhat laughably for customers in remote markets with no cellular
service-explorers in the Arctic, for instance, as well as oil rig workers on
far-off seas and trekkers in canyons.

A $100 million global marketing campaign did little to move Iridium
beyond its finite niches.

Customers were scarce from the outset. Iridium has about 20,000 today,
nowhere near the 100,000 it expected to have by the end of last year-and
light-years from the half-million it said it would need to break even. Chief
executive Edward Staiano was forced to resign in April. "These are tough
times," understated his successor, John Richardson, on the day of the
bankruptcy filing. (Richardson was traveling overseas and not available for
comment yesterday).

Iridium has vowed to keep the project running, restructure debts and
soldier forward. While supportive, Motorola has made no commitment to
add to the $1.66 billion it has already sunk into the venture. In sum,
Iridium has borrowed an estimated $3 billion to build the network; this
compares to the mere $1.45 million it reported in annual revenue in the
past fiscal year. Even if Iridium can settle its debts, many wireless analysts
doubt the company could assemble enough niche markets to sustain a
business.

Industry-watchers are pointing to Iridium as a defining failure of the times,
an Edsel for the tech-happy '90s.

"One of the features of [pioneering] developers is that they get their
self-worth all tangled up in their technologies," Pitasi said. It can blind
innovators to market shifts, he said, especially in a time when so much
investor cash is available to keep them going.

"Things like this happen on a much smaller scale than Iridium all the time,"
said Edson de Castro, a founder of Data General Corp., the
Massachusetts computing icon whose creation of the once-dominant
"mini-computer" in the 1970s was chronicled in the Tracy Kidder book
"Soul of a New Machine." DeCastro, whose company was crippled by
the advent of personal computers in the 1980s, sees no parallel between
Data General's downfall and Iridium's.

While both companies embarked on ambitious pursuits, Iridium tried to
launch an elaborate service all at once, with no intermediate checkpoints.
"It's a prescription for failure to undertake something like that and expect
to succeed all of a sudden," de Castro said. Iridium, he said, should have
offered a much more limited service early on, both to test its technical
viability and to gauge market reaction. "These markets are unknowable,
and the only way to learn about them is to put stuff out there in incremental
steps," he said.

Notwithstanding the resulting mess, some say Iridium will long be
respected-and remembered-as a technological triumph, albeit a business
failure. "To launch and manage a vast satellite network is a tremendous
achievement," said Bennett Kobb, a wireless industry analyst in Arlington.
"The stuff they rolled out is terrific," de Castro added.

Likewise, failure is considered a kind of badge of honor in high-tech
circles. Great companies fail all the time, said Cusumano, and they sink
vast amounts of cash into technologies that are never adopted. Early this
century, for instance, companies invested huge resources into things such
as electric and steam-driven cars.

And today, the number of technology companies that go public is a tiny
fraction of those that disintegrate. "No Fear to Fail" is a Silicon Valley
mantra.

But de Castro posits a corollary maxim that applies, unfortunately, to
Iridium.

"If you're gonna fail, fail fast and fail early," he said. "Don't go through 10
years and billions of dollars before you realize you're failing. That's when
things can turn really bad."

¸ 1999 The Washington Post Company



To: djane who wrote (6716)8/21/1999 3:39:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 29987
 
Info on G* bandwidth (via G* yahoo thread)

Top>Business & Finance>Investments>Sectors>Services>Communications
Services>GSTRF (Globalstar Telecommun.)




G* Bandwidth
by: gerald_clark (35/M/San Diego, CA)
10270 of 10345
Spoke with QcommEngr last evening via email and he gleened the following from one of the satellite
engineers:

Bandwidth for IS-95A: 1.3MHz
Generic bandwidth: 16.5MHz

He did not offer up information about the remaining BW that composes the 200MHz. Based on what he
said about the 16.5MHz, minimally, G* will be able to evolve its standards to include broadband
CDMA. This has a direct impact on the number of users that can be supported by each satellite. If the
remaining BW is able to be channelize similar to the 16.5MHz, then this system will be around for a long
time to come. I am buying more stock...

Jerry



To: djane who wrote (6716)8/21/1999 3:41:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29987
 
Summary of G* short argument (via G* yahoo thread)

Top>Business & Finance>Investments>Sectors>Services>Communications
Services>GSTRF (Globalstar Telecommun.)



Iridium $10B Market Cap before Tanking
by: sevencentsworth
10342 of 10346

Iridium was in this same exact position last year before tanking.
Is it time to short or will this thing go up a bit more on hype???
Iridium hit $ 70 (approx $10B market cap) a share before it's demise. It's web site looked similar to G*s.
No real way to sign-up or buy a phone. Partners web sites also without a clear way to sign up. Calls to
providers answered with "what are you talking about, let me take your name and number and I'll get back
to you." There is no clear description of how marketing is going to work. Bernie's statement of
"Marketing strategy in place". What the he** does that mean? Go out to Honduras or any other foreign
G* partner web site all you find is "license granted". What the He** does that mean??? Where are the
prices, the sign up forms, the discriptions to the potential user how G* is going to work for the user in
their area. How roaming is going to work. Where's the info??? why not use the G* phone as a cell phone
until the system is operational?

Is this net work of companies really working to make this a success? Iridium's partners thought if you
build it they will come.
They didn't figure it would take significant amount of additional investment in sales personel, training,
advertising, and lowering there add on tail charges. G* depends on their partners the same way. What
makes G* so different? Be specific, if you can't then sell.

By the way, G* has for july, 11,000,000 shares of a 50,000,000 float shorted. For every 5 float shares
there are 6 owners!!! 20% of the float!!! 9th in short position increase!!! Shorters have unlimited loss
potential while longs can only loose 100%. why bet a against the high number of shorts in this stock??
What do they know that he average gambling long doesn't?

Check out
viwes.com
viwes.com

Posted: 8/20/1999 8:29 pm EDT as a reply to: Msg 10312 by TradeMachine