SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chung Lee who wrote (29746)8/21/1999 2:09:00 AM
From: CGarcia  Respond to of 41369
 
it doesn't matter whether you have 56k or cable modem...when lag hits, due to so many people on the server at the same time, every connection will crawl...this is probably the biggest reason of all to avoid free internet access....while everybody, and their uncle, will be crawling along on their free isp...the less crowded "premium" isps will be sailing much faster...In fact, this might be a great selling tool for AOL should MSFT offer fre access..."Come join AOL...we're not FREE, but at least with us, you get where you're going before you have to get up to go to work!" hehehe



To: Chung Lee who wrote (29746)8/21/1999 9:20:00 AM
From: Vendit™  Respond to of 41369
 
Microsoft's Opening Shot At AOL?

Without a media event or even a press release, Microsoft launched a low cost Internet Service Provider last week. The ISP, marketed in Costco stores, is sold as a package that includes 3 months of internet access for $35.97, or $11.99 a month. Pricing after the initial three month period is unknown to our staff at report time.

The popular press will most likely portray the new service as a potential AOL access fee killer. However, an examination of the facts will all but destroy this assessment.

First, Costco is a warehouse club with 13 million members that caters to the needs of the middle class. A majority of these members already own computers and have an Internet service. The average Costco consumer is a member of a multi-person household, one of whom likely values content and community. The price sensitivity of these consumers is higher than most, but not so much that $7 a month will justify a severe lack of the content and community that a service like America Online readily offers.

Secondly, in a world of trial offers and "Free" service it is unlikely that consumers will pay $36 for a generic service without strong consumer support. Consumers don't want commitment, they want a courting period to figure out if the service is right for them. Why pop the question before the first date?

It may make more sense to use Costco as a distribution outlet for the new Internet service (similar to Dixon's distribution of FreeServe in England), and charge the consumer after a free trial.

Finally, this new service is generic. Costco Online sounds about as flashy as Campbell's Soup Online (how about it, Internet access with your Tomato soup). Consumers will most likely not be compelled to buy a service whose selling point is that you can pick it up in a warehouse.

America Online threat? I don't think so. A threat to other ISPs? Probably not. Media storm? Likely

streetadvisor.com




To: Chung Lee who wrote (29746)8/21/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Vendit™  Respond to of 41369
 
Who's Worth More? AOL vs. MSFT

Keith Benjamin, Robertson Stephen's Internet analyst, hosted a conference call for institutional investors this week covering developments in the America Online story.

Throughout the call, Keith drew many comparisons between AOL and Microsoft. The most valid of these comparisons was that Microsoft has grown to be a $500 billion company because it was in a position with its operating system business to then move into every other area. America Online is in a similar position today, as its platforms (the AOL service , the Internet, and Netscape) become market dominators. However, AOL has two huge advantages over Microsoft. First, Microsoft has almost made a policy of making enemies in its quest for power, while AOL has offered potential "enemies" partner-like status. Microsoft also alienated the public with poor customer service and bug laden products. America Online has strove for excellence in its relationships with customers, from free telephone support to self-updating software.

America Online is now approaching the 100 million desktop customer mark, counting AOL, Compuserve, ICQ, Netscape.com, and Winamp. Microsoft has 160 million desktop customers across all of its product lines. Mr. Benjamin did not go into this detail, but if America Online could derive a dollar amount of profit per desktop customer similar to Microsoft's $57.50, and grow at the same rate, AOL would deserve a valuation around $300 billion.

How close is AOL to $57.50 of profit per desktop customer? For 40 million of those users (those using the America Online and Compuserve services) that number is not far away. According to Mr. Benjamin's estimates these customers currently provide around $30 of profit for AOL each year. He believes that this number could reach $100 from rent alone within the next few years, which is plausible given the ever increasing rent that AOL charges advertisers and merchandisers. Ancillary services, including wireless AOL access, AOL TV, broadband, and others could also provide significantly more revenue per user. The 40-50 million unique users of America Online's web properties are where there is a lot of room to be made up. Currently, Mr. Benjamin estimates that each user produces $2 of revenue, a far cry from $57.50 of profit. However, he sees this number increasing to $30 per user in the next few years. Finally, with the recent acquisition of Winamp and Spinner.com, Mr. Benjamin anticipates that AOL will dominate the online music market. Quite simply, AOL has the market (100 million users) and the technology to coax major music labels online. These products could provide significantly more than $60 in profit per user per year.

Is an AOL that produces as much or more revenue per user than Microsoft possible? In short, yes. Within 5 years the AOL model will most likely be producing profits of at least $50 per user each year. With even the most conservative growth estimates AOL's desktop user base will reach 150 million. That means that the online giant could rake in $7.5 billion each year in profit, and make my trillion dollar company argument look a lot more likely.

streetadvisor.com



To: Chung Lee who wrote (29746)8/21/1999 9:39:00 AM
From: Vendit™  Respond to of 41369
 
Beginning to look a lot like e-Christmas

With record high temperatures roasting the country's midsection and parched, dead lawns in New Jersey, it's a little difficult to think of the winter holiday season right now. But just before they collectively took off for their summer vacations, the Wall Street analysts cranked up the holiday hype machine a little early.

Industry pundits are already buzzing about the "Blodget factor" -- the debate started on Wednesday by Internet analyst Henry Blodget of Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) when he issued a "holiday basket" of stock picks of e-commerce players that would benefit from the fourth quarter uptick in retail sales. Many of Mr. Blodget's picks fared well on the heels of his report on Wednesday but then fell back in a market decline on Thursday.

But beyond Mr. Blodget's report, the buzz is already circulating that it's going to be another e-Christmas.

My excitement and my model don't match," says Mitch Bartlett, Dain Rauscher's e-tailing analyst. Even though Mr. Bartlett has used a valuation model that gives him a price target of $125 for Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN), his gut instinct tells him the firm's stock could surge above that figure through the period running up to Christmas.

"Mr. Bartlett's enthusiasm stems from the rate at which Amazon.com is acquiring customers.

"If they add the same number of customers this quarter as they have done before, they could end up with 17 million customers, and most models don't assume this rate of growth," he says. Amazon.com currently has just over 10 million customers.

The analyst recently upgraded the stock to an Aggressive Buy. In line with the industry consensus figure gathered by the earnings information and stock research site IBES, Mr. Bartlett projects that Amazon.com's revenues could reach $450 million to $460 million for the fourth quarter this year, compared with fourth quarter revenues of $253 million last year. Mr. Bartlett believes that Amazon.com, like other online retailers, will benefit from holiday shoppers, more of whom have access to the Internet through cheap or free PCs. He also believes that Amazon.com's gamble to expand to a general retail store -- adding consumer electronics and toys -- will meet with success.

SEIZE THE SEASON
Of course, Amazon.com has been betting on this all along. That's what's made the pace of expansion a priority. In just a few months it has added substantial sections of its site -- including auctions, electronics, and toys and games -- specifically to prepare for this year's holiday shopping season.

Mr. Bartlett's enthusiasm mirrors those of his peers. Earlier this week, Mr. Blodget sent e-tailing shares upward when he included Amazon.com, America Online (NYSE: AOL), Yahoo (Nasdaq: YHOO), Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS), eToys (Nasdaq: ETYS), Lycos (Nasdaq: LCOS), and Excite@Home (Nasdaq: ATHM) among his "holiday basket" list. Mr. Blodget predicted that these stocks could trade 50 percent to 100 percent higher than their current levels by the end of the year and that consumers will double or triple the rate at which they buy goods online this holiday season.

Likewise, analyst James Preissler of PaineWebber (Nasdaq: PWJ), notes that AOL will also benefit in the fourth quarter, as subscriber growth kicks in with holiday PC purchases. He also notes that online usage rates go up as the weather gets cooler.

When asked about the seasonal influence on Internet e-tailing stocks, Mr. Preissler says it's as much a psychological factor with individual investors as it is a matter of valuations. "I wasn't willing to pull the trigger like [Mr. Blodget] was, but there's a big herd of retail investors, and you want to get in front of them," he says. "One of the things that happens is, as they shop at these places, they think about buying the stocks of the companies where they're shopping."

E-MALLS GETTING CROWDED
Of course, many of the Wall Street analysts' forecasts are based on numbers they receive from industry analyst firms. Preliminary forecasts would support the theory that explosive growth in e-tailing will continue this season.

On a preliminary basis, Forrester Research (Nasdaq: FORR) projects that e-tailing firms will reel in revenues of $10 billion in the fourth quarter this year -- up from $3.5 billion for the same period last year. Among other factors, Forrester expects more shoppers this year simply because AOL has added so many more subscribers, and that's where many online shoppers come from. Another factor is online shopping services, says Forrester research associate Carrie Ardito. She points to 911Gifts.com and WishClick as examples of services that make can online shopping easier for consumers.

Thomas Miller, a vice president at market research firm Cyber Dialogue thinks forecasts such as Mr. Blodget's are "well within possibility" because of the way the online audience has grown and evolved. He says that for this Christmas, whole families will be shopping online as opposed to the Internet's original majority audience of male technogeeks. Online shopping is also being propelled by more personalization on the sites as well as more marketing, he says. Cyber Dialogue's figures also reflect an increased number of shoppers online. For the first half of 1999, 24.4 million people purchased goods online, compared with 17.7 million for the first half of 1998.

Rakesh Sood, an e-commerce analyst at Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), says that unless the U.S. economy takes a nosedive, he expects, like Mr. Blodget, fourth quarter retail sales to triple this year over last year's sales. People are more used to shopping online, he says, and there are more options online now as well.


SERVICE IS KEY
Although securities analysts are generally enthusiastic about online retailing stocks, they say that their picks are stocks of online firms that they believe will be prepared for the holiday onrush -- a crucial factor since bad online service can be such a big turnoff. Like most other analysts, Lauren Cooks Levitan, BancBoston Robertson Stephens's e-tailing analyst, thinks the winners for the fourth quarter will be Amazon.com, Priceline.com (Nasdaq: PCLN), eToys, eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), and Alloy Online. But since Internet stocks are so volatile, BancBoston Robertson Stephens doesn't set price targets, she says.

Despite all these enthusiastic sentiments, the analysts' earnings per share losses for Amazon.com continue to widen. They expect the bookseller to lose 54 cents a share for the fourth quarter this year; for the overall year they expect the firm to lose $1.86 a share, after starting out expecting the company to lose 57 cents a share for 1999, according to First Call.

Still, these kinds of numbers don't seem to put people off, notes First Call/Thomson Financial's director of research Chuck Hill.

"That's what it takes for you to push your stock price up -- ever-widening losses," he jokes.

redherring.com




To: Chung Lee who wrote (29746)8/21/1999 9:49:00 AM
From: Vendit™  Respond to of 41369
 
Chung Lee

Stop hyping this stock!

:8-)