SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bridge Player who wrote (29748)8/21/1999 3:11:00 AM
From: CGarcia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
"Only after the cult of unreasonable expectations is finally totally shattered and fear replaces greed does the stock then become a reasonable investment again."

All tech leaders are good investments over the long term...no one can predict a stock's peak or bottom...but if the company is good, you will see gains at some point regardless of where you bought at...Look at MSFT, it keeps reaching for new highs...it's the leader in the software industry, the same as AOL is the leader in the isp business...there are reasons for AOL's drop in stock price, noe of which are changes in its fundamentals...If anyting, AOL's fundamentals have only gotten stronger over the last couple of months, while the stock's price has dropped...reasons for the drop range from the impending interest rate increase, to the summer blahs the market goes through each year...but anyone selling now, who doesn't intend to buy back soon, will no doubt miss the 1999 internet e-commerce rally the market will experience...AOL is an internet stock, and as such it will see irrationally high P/E's, and will bottom out just as quickly...the key to the stock is to figure on a decent bottom, during these lackluster months, and hold strong through the holiday seasons....the rewards will be great.



To: Bridge Player who wrote (29748)8/21/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: Pruguy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41369
 
BP,
I had reposted the links to my companies research report which supports a valuation that is double the current price. What in that report do you think is incorrect?