Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: eims2000 who wrote (5326)	8/21/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: RKHIII	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8858

The first use of the word "they" was not meant to specifically point to anyone. It was an omnibus use of the word. Sorry if you didn't understand that. A@P et.al. did not have to place the bet themselves, just learn of others who did and pursue it. My point, which you missed, was that A@P et.al. used that information, not to save or help this company, but to benefit financially from it, and positioned themselves accordingly. I'm convinced that some knew, perhaps illegally, of the investigation. It even had a code name, which denotes that it should have been kept under wraps. Obviously, it wasn't. Anthony is very good at what he does. I just cannot bring my self to agree with it. Having such a cadre of minions to help him only makes it worse, in my book. If a company collapses, for whatever reason, it and its stockholders deserve to go down with the ship. I am vehemently opposed to anyone benefiting financially from it. As far as calling me stupid....well, that's your game, not mine. I would never do that. I might think it, but I wouldn't stoop to writing it. Thanks for your thoughts, though.