Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Enigma who wrote (7333)	8/21/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81105

> Maybe you have a site on derivatives, internet stocks, golf on the > moon, or is your focus on gold? A gold bug by any other name? d Probably one the oldest gold site on the web, since July 1995, and also one of the largest. The one strategic mistake I made was to keep the site just a comprehensive objective directory, when I could have posted all kinds of articles, advice, and advertisements that catered to the goldbugs - and made some money !

To: Enigma who wrote (7333)	8/21/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81105

> There seems to be a certain smug satisfaction in your recent posts In addition to avoiding most gold stocks, I have also been biting my tongue for the past three years, and just blurted out the first thing that came to mind - very unprofessional of me, of course. In an effort to keep my site objective, I tried not to take positions, recommend stocks, seldom posted on discussion groups, etc.. When Bill Murphy asked me support GATA, I just professionally and courteously added a link to my site without taking a position. When my email gets filled with long tirades about gold, I just politely say thank you, wish them well, and hoped they enjoyed my site. I add to links to any gold related site, even questionable firms, in an effort to treat all equally and fairly. - comprehensive and objective, at the expense of my one subjective personal opinions.