To: bob who wrote (7392 ) 8/23/1999 10:36:00 PM From: Walter Morton Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18366
-----Original Message----- From: Blum, Kirk <kirk.blum@intel.com> Date: Monday, August 23, 1999 9:53 PM Subject: RE: FDI Mr. Morton, Intel(R) FDI requires a real-time operating system (with full multi-tasking capability) for it to operate. It is not designed to be a stand alone product. We found that most embedded O/S' (like most RTOS') out there have no idea how to implement an appropriately featured flash-based data/file manager. O/S developers tend to create only the most rudimentary flash capabilities (if any at all) and we found they needed to be supplemented. That is why we created FDI and our other flash software. Another difference is that Intel(R) FDI is also designed to work with non-removable linear flash, such as Intel's NOR flash offerings, and not ATA/IDE based flash as the web site indicates for e.Digital's MicroOS* products. These are quite different in operation. Intel is very careful about intellectual Property (IP), and we have our own extensive portfolio of flash (including software) patents that date back quite a few years. If you have any additional questions, I believe the Intel Investor Relations group (off of the www.intel.com site), or the Intel legal group may be able to help more. Kirk Blum ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kirk Blum - Sr. Technical Marketing Engineer - Flash Software Marketing Intel Corp - Flash Products Division / Computer Enhancement Group 1900 Prairie City Rd. MS: FM3-123 Folsom, CA 95630-9501 kirk.blum@intel.com -or- kblum@inside.intel.com voice=916-356-4577 FAX=916-356-2703 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * Other brands and names are property of their respective owners -----Original Message----- Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 1:01 AM To: kirk.blum@intel.com Subject: FDI In this "Tech Talk" developer.intel.com you stated that "FDI is an Intel© Flash media manager... is continuously evolving and in the future will gain even more functionality, including file handling features, code update capability, and support for future Intel Flash architectures." Does Intel plan to incorporate e.Digital Corp's MicroOS into the FDI to achieve "more functionality?" If no, how will FDI perform better than MicroOS and not infringe upon e.Digital's patents. How is FDI superior to MicroOS? How will FDI become superior to MicroOS (http://www.edig.com/profile.htm )? Thank you, Walter Morton