Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chung Lee who wrote (29799)	8/21/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 41369

Chung...so does that mean ... you're not buying 88 Million dollars worth of AOL? <<gg>>

To: Chung Lee who wrote (29799)	8/21/1999 7:55:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

I think Andreesen totally liquidated his shares of Netscape when he was with them prior to the merger. Of course if he had held those shares would have been worth a lot more... what is surprising to me is that he has so many options in AOL, he must have negotiated a sweet deal to hire on. Most assume these are leftover shares from his Netscape days but I don't think so.... BTW those links you are posting only work in browsemaster, other people can't read them, fwiw.

To: Chung Lee who wrote (29799)	8/21/1999 11:20:00 PM
From: Pruguy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41369

>>what part of that report do you think is incorrect and why? I look forward to your thought out answer per your post 29034 quoting Prudential analyst >>We have NO REASON TO EXPECT that any action by Microsoft will have any material impact to AOL over the coming two-three years at a minimum. really? no matter what Microsoft does, such faith, is AOL going to $200 in 8 months, you should have told Marc Andresson, he just shortchanged himself $100 million so you can buy AOL shares "on the cheap" I am always interested to know why the bears feel AOL will loose momentum. I asked you to provide me with a section of the research report which you feel is incorrect and why.....Just want to point out you did not do that yet...Love to hear it if you can come up with a logical response.