Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Syncrude who wrote (10061)	8/22/1999 1:44:00 AM
From: Tim Higginbotham	Respond to of 10836

Syncrude, Very well said! Regards, Tim

To: Syncrude who wrote (10061)	8/22/1999 12:17:00 PM
From: Carl	Respond to of 10836

Syncrude, go back and read this thread before the decision and I think you'll see it was I who was bashed, not the other way around.

To: Syncrude who wrote (10061)	8/22/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: charred	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10836

Syncrude you sayù,<<<<<I welcome both points of view, pro and con. I despise the blind bashing not supported by facts>>>>, you are full of bull. The fact is management owns Stay Management and therefore negotiation with KRY does have a conflict of interest. The reason I am not a shareholder for this? The question is who got the better deal? Is this called KRY bashing. >>>participating in constructive discussion of Crystallex.>>>, well Syncrude, about 6000 posts ago I mentioned that the people in the kilometer 88 have a different view than what Carson said. I lived and worked there for almost two years. Wasnït my input was worth something? What was said on the forum was not correct. When I questioned it, Guess what I was attack on this forum. Look in the mirror boy. Is this your idea of a constructive discussion of Crystallex?