SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David who wrote (3176)8/22/1999 1:02:00 AM
From: Mad2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10293
 
David;
Please ingratiate us with your all knowing views of stocks and investiment, now that you have developed a godly sense Bill and see fit to judge him. Or do you prefer to judge individuals because you find yourself in the deep end when it comes to stocks, securities and the like.
david give us a real investiment idea.....other than IDX please.

Message 11030520
Message 11029540
Mad2



To: David who wrote (3176)8/22/1999 4:42:00 AM
From: BelowTheCrowd  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
David,

It would seem that you are guilty of the same kind of thing you accuse Bill of, most notably:

> refers to himself in the third person.

I believe the one who does that is Mr. Pink. Bill almost always states his opinions as his.

The rare exceptions tend to be "announcement" type messages where he always clearly states his name.

Of course, they're both notorious for shorting crappy stocks, so in the minds of stock promoters, are probably one and the same...

mg



To: David who wrote (3176)8/22/1999 10:15:00 AM
From: Steve Felix  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
David, You forgot (e) never tells his followers (haallooo anyone out there?) to cover when a position goes against him, as invariably happens to us all from time to time. Perhaps he works for the Kaufman Fund, who if I remember correctly shorted Yahoo in the teens and covered much later around $185. It doesn't pay to forget rule #1.



To: David who wrote (3176)8/22/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: Bill Wexler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
<<This is not a serious person>>

The casual reader may then ask, "If Bill Wexler is not to be taken seriously as you say, then why do you waste your time posting on his thread in a lame attempt to discredit him?"

Moron.