SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dan3 who wrote (69535)8/22/1999 4:59:00 PM
From: greg nus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574051
 
dan i heard al and cu don't mix well.



To: Dan3 who wrote (69535)8/22/1999 7:34:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574051
 
Dan3, From what people say it is worthwhile as the lower conductivity means less heat and more speed at the same size. Going smaller reduces the heat but you are also going faster so a better conductor is needed. As another says you need to use special boundary materials to allow copper and aluminium to work together. I have heard they have solved this problem?? as with no solution they would stop running as the copper penetrated the aluminum under the accelerated diffusion brought on by the CPU heat.

Bill



To: Dan3 who wrote (69535)8/22/1999 11:59:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574051
 
Dan, Bill, <I believe that AMD's strategy for next spring is .18 Al K6 at FAB25, and .18 Cu Athlon at FAB 30>

Why not use Al-0.25 just for the K6-3, and do all Athlon 0.18 in Dresden?

Petz