SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonkie who wrote (33820)8/22/1999 4:25:00 PM
From: cicak  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
Zonkie - may I shear your wool if TSIG reports positive earnings in the 4th quarter ?

<< the ones like me that have never owned it but post about it every once in a while >> How ridiculous can one be - Zonkie is just another who doesn't own the stock but spends a lot of his "valuable time" on the thread sharing his "wisdom". ROTFLMAO !!!

agric.nsw.gov.au

"There exists in society a very special class of persons
that I have always referred to as the Believers. These are
folks who have chosen to accept a certain religion,
philosophy, theory, idea or notion and cling to that belief
regardless of any evidence that might, for anyone else,
bring it into doubt. They are the ones who encourage and
support the fanatics and the frauds of any given age. No
amount of evidence, no matter how strong, will bring them
any enlightenment.
They are the sheep who beg to be
fleeced and butchered, and who will battle fiercely to
preserve their right to be victimized." -- James Randi



To: zonkie who wrote (33820)8/22/1999 7:42:00 PM
From: Rich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 44908
 
Yes, it's hard to believe that something like this could happen but I thought you might want to be aware. Also, do you guys think we can all grow up now and start using this thread in a meaningful manner?

FOUR MEN CHARGED IN STOCK PROMOTION SCHEME
Detroit Free Press - August 19, 1999
freep.com

Rich



To: zonkie who wrote (33820)8/22/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Suzanne Newsome  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44908
 
Mr. Zonkie,

I am replying at length to you because I believe you are the bane of the SI experience. You drop in on a thread where you have no stock, bash a little, and cause people such as myself to waste valuable time responding to you.

When I first started reading your replies, I thought, "Hey, this guy thinks the company is going to succeed!" But as I read further, it became apparent that when you say the "business plan is working," you mean something totally different from what the rest of the world thinks that phrase means. So you actually do not think the company is going to make money, but you never said why. You use common phrases to mean other than what their accepted meanings are, sir.

You referred to the "people in power getting rich." That is really an irrelevant issue if we are trying to decide whether to invest in the company or not. Anybody who founds a successful company is likely to get rich. That point is irrelevant.

Your outstanding share estimate made 2 months ago is more accurate than my casual prediction made 15 months ago. Now there's a real shocker! Of course you failed to mention the context of the post you linked. I was making a case for a reasonable stock price to be $3.20 in contrast to the double-digit stock price being touted by the IR guy. Not exactly hyping under those circumstances. You misrepresented the context of my 15-month old post.

You say revenue will be less than 5% of whatever I projected. Considering over a period of time those projections have ranged from $80 million to $390 million, your statement is so vague as to be meaningless. Plus you never state why you believe revenues will be less than 5%. So your statement was vague and unsupported by facts, reasoning, or logic.

So, Mr. Zonkie, in a narrow technical sense, you have not lied. You have however attempted to harm this company by confusing the meaning of phrases, by irrelevance, by quoting out of context, by vagueness, and by failing to present facts, reasoning, and logic. OTOH, it occurs to me that you may be performing at your maximum capabilities.

Regards, Suzanne