SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dr. Microcap who wrote (5862)8/22/1999 4:11:00 PM
From: GraceZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
 
I'd like to ask a stupid question: If you short a stock and then it gets halted before you can cover, then the company goes belly up making the shares worth $0.....do you still have to replace the shares you borrowed?



To: Dr. Microcap who wrote (5862)8/22/1999 4:19:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
 
The way i see it..in the event this stock doesnt get halted in the next few days..It may rise slightly but will never be able to sustain any kind of level.. at 4 bucks it still has a market valuation in excess of 120,000,000 bucks for a scammy criminal investigated company.. So if it does go up..Guess who wil be waiting with his Tokyo Joke Bat! ( it never misses )



To: Dr. Microcap who wrote (5862)8/22/1999 4:20:00 PM
From: Techplayer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
 
Dr. M, what does the premier have to do with Starnet. Ng was claimed to have owned no more than 25k shares, which is true. There is no connection between a land based casino and clark. what was just proven by all of the posts by people that can't even read? you guys are funny...

Brian