Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Silkroad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (515)	8/23/1999 2:11:00 AM
From: ahhaha	Respond to of 626

Frequencies get assigned in the stripped sideband. They're chosen by clock sampling and mixed on. It's a completely random assignation. What's in a name? All the fundamental constructs can be retained, but many are uselessly cumbersome since they are based on old awkward technologies. If IP is preferred at the beginning and the end of transmission, then that's what will be shipped. The layers of management can also be handled similarly. Some of it is good and some of it isn't. The bell started as an adjunct in telegraph, evolved to critical with the telephone, and still hangs around in computer telecommunications on the ASCII code page. None of the fundamentals are very fundamental. They are just conventional and habitual. Most won't survive the next twenty years. That has been the rule in technological evolution. How can one become sentimental towards them? Telephone didn't seek to hide in a niche when it was first developed. No one can control that kind of thing. Something ends up clinging to life in a niche if it isn't very good. This technology is as far above good as it gets, because it is both better and cheaper. It's a testament to the superiority of genius over intellect. Genius comes from god and intellect comes from man. I would advise the company from taking any attitude towards existing technologies. It isn't necessary when you have a categorically superior solution. A good question to ask is, "I can see how discretely separating a narrow beam, layering it in the 4th dimension with RF inputs, and shipping the stack of dishes down the line works, but how do you detect, separate, all that back down into its components"? Also, "a stack attenuates over distance and boosting also boosts quantum errors of the photonic characteristic space mostly influenced by incongruities in the doped crystal, but also influenced by system exogenous factors, So are these errors stable and manageable?" There are many other questions including the exact spin order structure of the 4th spatial dimensional extension needed to compactify multiple amplitudes coherently in the same space which allows spacetime evolution to occur consistent with conservation of Faraday. ahhaha isn't the subject here.

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (515)	8/23/1999 2:55:00 PM
From: Kachina	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 626

I think that the point of this discussion still needs to be: Is this company really doing what they claim? There are still the outstanding weirdnesses of: 1.Their white paper which contains some pretty outrageous stuff, and is written - well, I've made that clear before. 2. The description in this thread of the quite strange visit to the company. And I am, quite frankly, wondering - of those primarily participating here - who is genuinely drawn in, and who is providing chaff to drown out substantial discussion. Sorry ahaha, but far too much of your prose is apropos of nothing. We have established conclusively in this recent thread, in a backhanded manner, that there are alternative technologies which can more than adequately explain anything seen as a demo to date.