Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Starnet (SNMM)Online gaming, sexsites, lottery, Sportsbook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Techplayer who wrote (6035)	8/23/1999 10:28:00 AM
From: who cares?	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

re: innocent until proven guilty, i'm all for it, but I play the odds, and the odds are when this much crap happens it's not bad luck or for no reason or to smear some politician, etc., odds heavily favor something real real bad being wrong. Patience grasshopper. Mr. Burns

To: Techplayer who wrote (6035)	8/23/1999 10:29:00 AM
From: trader14U	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 8858

hey CM...these guys have all lost their minds, and clinically speaking are in denial...which ain't just a river in Egypt...their stock was 20 bucks just a few short weeks ago and now it is 6 bucks, and they're whooping it up...go figure...

To: Techplayer who wrote (6035)	8/23/1999 10:43:00 AM
From: peter michaelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8858

Brian. Lurker here. Innocent until proven guilty - absolutely a great policy in cases where the powerful State is up against the weaker individual. In this case, I am not empowered to send SNMM to jail, so the policy is inapplicable. I think the odds are good enough that there is something untoward here that I no longer wish to own the stock at anything above $2 per share. peter