Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug B. who wrote (32227)	8/23/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: Robert O	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

ot Re: This all depends upon whether there is a countably infinite or uncountably infinite number of settings. Doug, shame on you. The natural numbers are an example of a countably infinite set and the real numbers are an example of an uncountably infinite set. Since we all know the Continuum Hypothesis is not a standard assumption in mathematics and, in fact, most set theorists think it is false, you can't pull me down into this non-axiomatic mud trap. ;) RO What's next? Finding a hole in Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem ?