Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ATI Technologies in 1997 (T.ATY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Method who wrote (3916)	8/24/1999 9:13:00 AM
From: Stocker	Respond to of 5927

From TheStreet.com...... Was Nvidia Stuffing Its Distribution Channel With 'Anything That Wasn't Nailed Down?' By Herb Greenberg Senior Columnist 8/24/99 6:30 AM ET Tuesday's trash: Too graphic?: The last time this column mentioned graphics chip maker Nvidia (NVDA:Nasdaq), the issue was whether S3's (SIII:Nasdaq) purchase of Nvidia customer, Diamond Multimedia (DIMD:Nasdaq), would put a crimp in Nvidia's sales. The S3/Diamond deal came on the heels of 3Dfx's (TDFX:Nasdaq) acquisition of STB Systems, another Nvidia customer. Nvidia's response: No big deal. And judging by the 46% jump in Nvidia's stock since then, investors apparently agreed. Easy to understand why, based on last week's report of a 543% increase in revs for Nvidia, with an equally impressive spike in earnings. Until you take a little closer look at the numbers. Remember what this column said recently about how quality of earnings is more important than quantity of earnings? Nvidia is a classic. According to a post-earnings report by Hambrecht & Quist analyst David Wehner, at quarter's end Nvidia had 15 days of inventory on hand, "far below the company's target of 30 to 45 days." Days outstanding of receivables, meanwhile, were 59 days, "higher than the company's target of 45 days, indicating a heavily back-end-loaded quarter due to new products shipping in the last several weeks." Hello! Sharply lower inventories and higher receivables? Last time I heard a company explain away high receivables to late shipments of new products was by Cabletron Systems (CS:NYSE) -- just before its earnings, and stock, blew up! Wehner didn't appear alarmed by the numbers. (Can ya' blame him? His firm is one of Nvidia's underwriters.) But short-sellers are having a field day with them, and one went so far as to tell me it smacked of a company stuffing the distribution channel with merchandise. "This is a heads-you-win, tails-you-win situation," the short-seller says. "The head of the coin shows that days receivables were too high, which means they stuffed the channel. The tail is that they shipped everything off the loading dock that wasn't nailed down." This short's own analysis, using Wehner's published figures, is that if Nvidia's inventory and receivables had been in line with the company's own targets, earnings would've been more like 12 cents per share, not 19 cents, as reported, which actually beat Wall Street estimates by a penny. Nvidia officials couldn't be reached.

To: Method who wrote (3916)	8/24/1999 2:56:00 PM
From: SBHX	Respond to of 5927

I only got the 16MB version. It runs quake3 pretty well. I can run 1600x1200x32 with this card, but I guess you need 32MB if you want to run 3D in that mode. I bought mine in an oem package (black anti-static plastic bag)in a discount computer store, but all the cables were there. Also, the DVD playback is visually better than the AIW-pro. It claims to capture mpeg2, I have not tried it yet. The TV tuner video output seems to be sharper than the AIW-pro, and it works in 1600x32. IE: I can have the webbrowser on the left, the TV window on the top right, and an interactive stock quote window in the bottom right. This is a very good setup on a 21" monitor. I haven't heard about the 32MB A-I-W-128 yet, but I think everybody's chips will have problems at 1600x32bpp 3D. It probably works, but will be too slow. Only complaint: My monitor will do 1920 or 1800, but I can't select that mode. However, even with 21", 1600x1200 produces text that is barely legible, and changing font size for the desktop confuses many web pages. (I'm hunting for a good 30" that will do 1600@85Hz.)