SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : JFK Jr., Is this an assasination? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (460)8/24/1999 5:51:00 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Respond to of 542
 
Here's another astute analysis extracted from C. Wright Mills's Power Elite:

But we must always be historically specific and open to complexities. The simple Marxian view makes the big economic man the real holder of power; the simple liberal view makes the big political man the chief of the power system; and there are some who would view the warlords as virtual dictators. Each of these is an oversimplified view. It is to avoid them that we use the term 'power elite' rather than, for example, 'ruling class.' (1)

In so far as the power elite has come to wide public attention, it has done so in terms of the 'military clique.' The power elite does, in fact, take its current shape from the decisive entrance into it of the military. Their presence and their ideology are its major legitimations, whenever the power elite feels the need to provide any. But what is called the 'Washington military clique' is not composed merely of military men, and it does not prevail merely in Washington. Its members exist all over the country, and it is a coalition of generals in the roles of corporation executives, of politicians masquerading as admirals, of corporation executives acting like politicians, of civil servants who become majors, of vice-admirals who are also the assistants to a cabinet officer, who is himself, by the way, really a member of the managerial elite.

Neither the idea of a 'ruling class' nor of a simple monolithic rise of 'bureaucratic politicians' nor of a 'military clique' is adequate. The power elite today involves the often uneasy coincidence of economic, military, and political power.
[...]



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (460)8/24/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: MNI  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542
 
I note on passing that you took no attempt at all to confront my question: who should, and how, determine who is not mediocre, but excellent?

However, I would like to hear an example acknowledged by you of how mediocres have changed history. What do you think of Johannes Gutenberg?

Regards MNI