SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8798)8/24/1999 11:08:00 AM
From: B Spears  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 11417
 
Taken from todays Red Herring. These guys need to be talking to WAVE. If they are going to encrypt and cache this data stream then they will have to talk to WAVE.

Cheers

Bob Spears

The threat to Replay and Tivo

The personal TV servers sold by Replay and Tivo are
ground-breaking advances. But the Internet could make both
products into historical curiosities.

With a proper network and storage
architecture, any show can be delivered to
any customer at any time, or paused or
rewound. For example, the Canadian
company iMagicTV replaces the cable
television infrastructure with TCP/IP,
broadcasting everything in streaming MPEG
format. You put one of its special DSL
modems on top of your TV, and
iMagicTV-equipped "cable companies" stream channels and shows
on demand. The television basically becomes a Web browser with
a TV-like user interface. IMagicTV plans to roll out "Network
VCR" and "Timeless TV" products in the future. (Also in the
iMagicTV value chain: Newbridge Networks's DSL hardware and
Pixstream's TV-to-MPEG encoders.)

Cable (and phone) operators will jump on this technology and find
ways to charge for it. It also gives back to broadcasters the control
of the commercial-skip functionality that's threatening their
revenues.

Many people will want to keep their TV show storage local; many
people also still have answering machines. But just as
phone-company voice mail is a threat to the answering machine
market, network storage of entertainment will have a serious impact
on Replay and Tivo



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8798)8/24/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: catherineiw  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 11417
 
Mr. Dude:

For your reading enjoyment...

biz.yahoo.com



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (8798)8/25/1999 3:08:00 AM
From: Marty Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11417
 
Dear TexasDude..

I take it you're asking me these questions for fun. You're obfuscatory enough in your own delightful way to answer them for yourself. You know that my reference to the "pace" of WAVX is not related to temporary market valuation. Instead, consider the networking of WAVX with other companies addressing similar issues. "Some other company may eventually catch up and keep pace" with WAVX, however, no such company is CURRENTLY evident. No other company, if fact, no consortium of companies, hoping to distribute digital content in packages produced by both media moguls and at-home-desk-top publishers is replete without the solutions already being offered by Wave Systems Corporation. It's NOT a matter of catching up to WAVX. It is now more a matter of when "some other" company might supplant WAVX; more a game of how long the other companies can hold WAVX off.... If IBM or Microsoft owned our technology, the market would feel the thrust of its inevitable deployment and success as a "consumer choice." We'd also have far less to gain as investors.

Sincerely,
Marty