Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Societe Anonyme/No Pennies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: proud dad who wrote (90463)	8/24/1999 9:45:00 AM
From: flyboy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 119973

LOOK...steve harmon pick... _________________________ e-harmon.com's NetStock! by Steve Harmon ceo of e-harmon.com "for the internet investor" e-harmon.com ___________________________ Conventional wisdom says that the search and guide space was long over as far as new stocks, that Yahoo, Lycos, Excite, and Infoseek had soaked up Wall Street's thirst for portals eons ago. Along comes 1999 and 3 new-generation Web guides have popped out the public window to a warm welcome. LookSmart (NASDAQ:LOOK) was the most-recent debutante, coming out into the public market at a time when Internet IPOs are more "traditionally" priced (rather than price raised just before IPO). Given the market's low tolerance it's not surprising to see LOOK trading at a relative discount to GoTo.com (NASDAQ:GOTO) and AskJeeves (NASDAQ:ASKJ). The question that brings up is what is the fair value for any of the three? First of all I believe GOTO looks over-valued based on its revenue, multiple and market cap. ASKJ also looks frothy but the recent corporate licensing deals it struck could bode well for its future more than the numbers show today. Is LookSmart then a $1.4 billion firm, is that a fair value? My analysis shows LOOK at about 31x annualized 1999 revenue for the wholesale search Web portal, vs. 73x for AskJeeves (NASDAQ:ASKJ) and 120x for GOTO. 28x appears tame vs. the other two. LookSmart revenue for the second quarter also dwarfs the other two as the table here illustrates: ********************************************************************** * GoTo.com AskJeeves LookSmart Market cap $1,732 $797 $1,436 Latest Q rev $3.6 $2.7 $11.5 Latest Q loss $(7.0) $(10.0) $(11.4) Annualized rev $14.4 $10.9 $45.9 Rev multiple per annualized 120 73 31 Unique users 7.3 3.2 10.1 Mkt cap/unique users $235.68 $251.63 $142.79 all figures in millions except multiples and value/user (c) 1999 e-harmon.com, inc. may be shared for non-commercial purposes with copyright in place ********************************************************************** * On a per unique user basis LOOK trades at $142 vs. more than $200 for GOTO and ASKJ. Being a more "traditional" guide I think costs LookSmart some appeal whereas GoTo's bid-it-up ad model and AskJeeves' question and answer metaphor for doing search do add value in ways LookSmart does not. LookSmart is more "old school" search than either of the others in our comparison. So let's take the comparison a little further to a stock that could also be seen in the same camp, perhaps closer in some ways to LookSmart's "wholesale" guide/content approach: Infospace (NASDAQ:INSP), which gathers and distributes content from numerous providers to numerous Web sites. My analysis shows INSP trades at about 70x estimated 1999 revenue. Another peer that reinforces the notion implied here that LookSmart could begin to look a little smarter on Wall Street very soon.