Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Technologyguy who wrote (8367)	8/24/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 9818

This is total baloney. Entirely not credible. TG, You and I know that. But we also know that credible conspiracy theories are inherently oxymoronic. Certainly there is no reason to build another "bunker" in DC when there is one right under the White House. Regards, Ron

To: Technologyguy who wrote (8367)	8/24/1999 8:02:00 PM
From: Ken	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9818

<not credible.Evidence? None>Wake up,tguy!!! Bull on there not being evidence!!! Wake up!! You call anything you don't want to believe "baloney", or worse, being such an irrevocable polllllllllllllly! The first three bunkers already have evidence! The others are not being publicly announced yet for reasons that require little logic to reason thru! you won't have long to wait for more evidence! Watch and learn! Both of you who think whatever you do not know, doesn't exist! Watch and learn!

To: Technologyguy who wrote (8367)	8/24/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Jeff Mizer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9818

>Three have been confirmed: LA, NY, I think the other is in Ohio. < >>>This is total baloney. Entirely not credible. Evidence? None.<<< Uhhhhhhhh sorry techo and Ron-- Ken is right on this.... we had an article in a Columbus paper about our "Bunker" incl. picture and interviews with state people. The LA one was also well reported some months ago and very legit. Kens people skills are poor but you are flat wrong on this one. Jeff