Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Thread Formerly Known as No Rest For The Wicked -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jenna who wrote (54999)	8/24/1999 7:04:00 PM
From: Tim Luke	Respond to of 90042

You are no stock trader or you would have had a nice business going by now like us others>>> like i have said i don't think it's right to charge people unlike you...and go ahead and call jill have me booted for good...it will piss off alot of paying members..you think you are the big cheese on si...LOL... lastshadow is a great guy

To: Jenna who wrote (54999)	8/24/1999 7:05:00 PM
From: London Brian	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

I'm glad somebody has been studying his messages, 'cause I was afraid that 55k messages went to waste.

To: Jenna who wrote (54999)	8/24/1999 9:32:00 PM
From: stan s.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90042

>>>You are no stock trader or you would have had a nice business going by now like us others.<<< Oh, really? You mean, why would anybody do this for free? Aimed at Tim perhaps but painted with a rather broad brush. A word or two from an unbiased observer. Yes, unbiased, even though this is where I've posted most recently. There's an implied arrogance in the above statement. Disquieting at best, smug and arrogant at worst. The inference, only thinly veiled, is that any good stock trader would have a pay site by now...or, at the very least be charging for a newsletter. Not so Jenna and you know it. It's wise to choose one's words in a less reckless manner. One never knows who's reading. Even some of your most ardent backers might find the phrasing offensive. What exactly does it mean? Seems pretty clear...but I'd be interested to know for sure. Regards. Stan