Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Verve who wrote (19798)	8/25/1999 3:02:00 AM
From: patrick tang	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25814

Re: About FPGA and what it'll mean to LSI? ...... Perhaps a semi-engineer could help illuminate us with their take on it? I think the best person on the board to do that might be Tony Viola. patrick

To: The Verve who wrote (19798)	8/25/1999 3:12:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Respond to of 25814

Ron: In terms of overall knowledge, I can't hold Shane's jock strap. So I always welcome his posts. But I think that he did a real disservice to his relationship with LSI corporate when he drifted into the obscenities. That sort of stuff clearly reflected poorly on Shane. The FPGA issue is huge, and it will be discussed in much greater detail over the next 12 to 18 months on both this board and in the media. My bet is on the LSI--not XLNX. After all, it was XLNX (the leader in FPGA) that was trying to peddle its technology to LSI rather than LSI trying to peddle its technology to XLNX. That says a lot.