SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Process Boy who wrote (69823)8/25/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: ericneu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576344
 
I suppose you can take that more than one way. However, even MSFT can't stop the eventual progression from 32 to 64. As far as I know, MSFT is still porting to Merced. For MSFT to just throw up their hands and say this 64 bit stuff is too hard would be very foolish, IMHO, and I have to believe that if their 'scaling back", it's on platforms, not from 64 to indefinite 32.
---

There's no "scaling back" going on at Microsoft - the development of 64-bit NT (er, Win2000) continues. Actually, 64-bit NT has already been demo'd, both on the Merced simulator and on Alpha. The recent announcement is purely a Compaq decision, not a joint Compaq/Microsoft one.

(Following IMHO only - not the view of my employer, blah blah)
Xeons and Profusion scale pretty nicely, are better understood by most IT staff, and cost less than Alphas. Alpha, never a large player to begin with, was being ignored by the consumers in the NT Server marketplace. I think this is just a case of Compaq facing reality, nothing more.

- Eric