Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (59162)	8/25/1999 10:00:00 AM
From: C Kahn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Neocon, After reading the following comment, I am more thankful than ever to be an American. C Kahn "....Dhaka, Bangladesh - A woman died after an Islamic cleric ordered her buried to the waist in mud and flogged 101 times with a bamboo cane for having premarital sex and inducing an abortion."

To: Neocon who wrote (59162)	8/25/1999 10:56:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<< stupid to try to make brees responsible for the actions of a fanatical Muslim in Pakistan, when he can speak for himself and his own treatment of his wife and children... Me:<<At the same time you worship the murderers of women who have the strength to reject your so called philosophy..... I don't have to resort to name calling.....What.... you are shouts loudly for all the world to see!>> I stand by this He "worsships the murders ....this is in no way to say he is responsible for their actions . It speaks of the religion that he worships...This was the topic of debate. And what he is... a worshiper of a religion that murders while at the same time denouncing these actions. Me: His attitude about punishment tells me that although he will not admit it this behavior [in the news release ] is spawned by the self righteous like himself>> Welll...........I must admit that you have me on this one...... I will only say that Bree's comment himself........... "establish a system for punishing someone for taking a "human" life or interfering with its development,"............. Is the basis for this response. It does state that he would indeed mistreat women if they refused to follow his particular beliefs ...... So you are right.... He does speak for himself ....Let the chips fall where they may. I stand by all those posts..... Nothing I said was untrue. You have only gone to the trouble to point this out. pez