Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : why did anthony@pacific and mary@pacific get suspended -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (25)	8/25/1999 5:21:00 PM
From: BG Smith	Respond to of 38

The action by SI seems unwarranted at best, vindictive at worst. It is however, totally consistent with the capricous nature of SI. SI is starting to behave like the spoiled rich brat who owns the ball and takes it home in mid-game in a fit of temper.

To: Tim Luke who wrote (25)	8/25/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Rich	Respond to of 38

To Anybody in "authority" at SI, This is a travesty. Not only that, it is POOR business. Anyone with any business sense recognizes that suspending Anthony and his wife, WITHOUT CAUSE, is the most asinine thing they could do for the reputation of SI. I hardly ever post on SI, but I read a TON. I got in when it was still $75 for a lifetime membership, and would have gladly paid monthly dues, until now. I'm moving my business elsewhere. Unfortunately, for most businesses, the only way they can understand when there is an issue is when you patronize another establishment. In the electronic medium, its not too bright to piss off your customer base when the competition is only a click away. See ya SI. Rich